![]() Several factors come into play here given we are dealing with patient information. The standardization on the 5505 for remote endpoints was done before I started but I think I would have made a similar decision. The web side is not used in the data exchange and wireless is definitely not needed.ĭcline a great question. In our situation the important part is the IPSEC/IKE vpn tunnels. Our situation will require some serious re-evaluation but I can see the red flags already. I don't consider a $1k + Smartnet router to be a good fit anymore for the SMB market in general when there are viable solutions at a much lower cost. You will be driving us loyal customers to other solutions. This is at least double what we were paying in the past and is going to impact our support costs greatly for the endpoints. Keep in mind that this is probably MSRP but the base unit is $995 and the sec plus at $1695. There is an engineers training by Cisco on the 12th I will try to edge my way in to but I am distressed at what I am seeing for pricing. As I understand it the 5506-x seems to be the frontrunner for replacements but not yet available. While great ideas we have to keep full compatibility with our existing 5510 primary firewalls, which is why we would prefer to stay with Cisco equipment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |